Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorArteche, Josu
dc.contributor.authorMajovská, Renata
dc.contributor.authorMariel, Petr
dc.contributor.authorOrbe, Susan
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T13:22:01Z
dc.date.available2011-08-08T13:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationEkonomický časopis = Journal of economics. 2011, roč. 59, č. 5, s. 472-487.cs
dc.identifier.issn0013-3035
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/89049
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherEkonomický ústav SAV a Prognostický ústav SAVcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEkonomický časopis = Journal of economicscs
dc.subjectcalendar effecten
dc.subjectEaster effecten
dc.subjectTRAMOen
dc.subjecttime seriesen
dc.subjectrecursive estimationen
dc.subjectinformation criteriaen
dc.titleDetekce a korekce předvelikonočního a velikonočního efektucs
dc.title.alternativeDetection and correction of the pre-Easter and Easter effectcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.locationNení ve fondu ÚKcs
dc.description.abstract-enThis study compares eight different alternatives of detection and correction of Easter and pre-Easter effect. These are two calendar effects, which are usually subtracted from the time series analyzed before its decomposition into trend/ cycle, seasonality and irregular part. The proposed alternatives differ by the duration of these effects and are compared using regression coefficients, infor-mation criteria and recursive estimation. In the empirical application are used data of Index of industrial production of Czech Republic, Poland and Slovak Republic and three north-Spanish provinces. The conclusions, which can be drawn from the study and which are based on very different data, are that the Easter effect should be always detected and corrected separately and not to-gether with another calendar effect.en
dc.identifier.wos000292792100003


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam