| dc.contributor.author | Major, Maciej | |
| dc.contributor.author | Major, Izabela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-09T06:37:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-03-09T06:37:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sborník vědeckých prací Vysoké školy báňské - Technické univerzity Ostrava. Řada stavební. 2014, roč. 14, č. 2, s. 79-84 : il. | cs |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1213-1962 | cs |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/111362 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this article a comparative analysis was performed between analytical method and widely
available computer programs employed in beam design like: ADINA, Robot Structural Analysis,
Intersoft R2D2 and RM-WIN. In the analysis a simple case of a simply supported beam and
uniformly distributed load over the length of the span was assumed. The conclusions from analysis
are presented at the end of the study | cs |
| dc.format.extent | 308473 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | cs |
| dc.publisher | Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava | cs |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Sborník vědeckých prací Vysoké školy báňské - Technické univerzity Ostrava. Řada stavební | cs |
| dc.rights | © Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava | cs |
| dc.title | Computer aided design – comparative analysis of widely available software with analytical method | cs |
| dc.type | article | cs |
| dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
| dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |