Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorCvek, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorKnybel, Lukáš
dc.contributor.authorMolenda, Lukáš
dc.contributor.authorOtáhal, Břetislav
dc.contributor.authorJonszta, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorCzerný, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorFeltl, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-19T12:41:42Z
dc.date.available2017-10-19T12:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationReports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2016, vol. 21, issue 3, p. 278-283.cs
dc.identifier.issn1507-1367
dc.identifier.issn2083-4640
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/120658
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate liver tumor motion and how well reference measurement predicts motion during treatment. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 20 patients with colorectal cancer that had metastasized to the liver who were treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. An online respiratory tumor tracking system was used. Tumor motion amplitudes in the superior-inferior (SI), latero-lateral (LL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were collected to generate patient-specific margins. Reference margins were generated as the mean motion and 95th percentile of motion from measurements recorded for different lengths of time (1, 3, and 5 min). We analyzed the predictability of tumor motion in each axis, based on the reference measurement and intra-/interfraction motions. Results: About 96,000 amplitudes were analyzed. The mean tumor motions were 9.9 +/- 4.2 mm, 2.6 +/- 0.8 mm, and 4.5 +/- 1.8 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The intrafraction variations were 3.5 +/- 1.8 mm, 0.63 +/- 0.35 mm, and 1.4 +/- 0.65 mm for the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The interfraction motion variations were 1.32 +/- 0.79 mm, 0.31 +/- 0.23 mm, and 0.68 +/- 0.62 mm for the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The Pear son's correlation coefficients for margins based on the reference measurement (mean motion or 95th percentile) and margins covering 95% of the motion during the whole treatment were 0.8-0.91, 0.57-0.7, and 0.77-0.82 in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. Conclusion: Liver tumor motion in the SI direction can be adequately represented by the mean tumor motion amplitude generated from a single 1 min reference measurement. Longer reference measurements did not improve results for patients who were well-educated about the importance of regular breathing. Although the study was based on tumor tracking data, the results are useful for ITV delineation when tumor tracking is not available.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherElseviercs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapycs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.003cs
dc.rightsCopyright © 2015 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.cs
dc.subjectliver cancercs
dc.subjecttumor motioncs
dc.subjectinternal target volumeacs
dc.titleA single reference measurement can predict liver tumor motion during respirationcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.003
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume21cs
dc.description.issue3cs
dc.description.lastpage283cs
dc.description.firstpage278cs
dc.identifier.wos000408481700021


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam