Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorKnybel, Lukáš
dc.contributor.authorCvek, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorNeuwirth, Radek
dc.contributor.authorJiravský, Otakar
dc.contributor.authorHečko, Jan
dc.contributor.authorPenhaker, Marek
dc.contributor.authorŠramko, Marek
dc.contributor.authorKautzner, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12T10:53:44Z
dc.date.available2021-07-12T10:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy. 2021, vol. 26, issue 1, p. 128-137.cs
dc.identifier.issn1507-1367
dc.identifier.issn2083-4640
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/143161
dc.description.abstractBackground: Here we aimed to evaluate the respiratory and cardiac-induced motion of a ICD lead used as surrogate in the heart during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Data provides insight regarding motion and motion variations during treatment. Materials and methods: We analyzed the log files of surrogate motion during SBRT of ventricular tachycardia performed in 20 patients. Evaluated parameters included the ICD lead motion amplitudes; intrafraction amplitude variability; correlation error between the ICD lead and external markers; and margin expansion in the superior-inferior (SI), latero-lateral (LL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions to cover 90% or 95% of all amplitudes. Results: In the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively, the mean motion amplitudes were 5.0 +/- 2.6, 3.4. +/- 1.9, and 3.1 +/- 1.6 mm. The mean intrafraction amplitude variability was 2.6 +/- 0.9, 1.9 +/- 1.3, and 1.6 +/- 0.8 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The margins required to cover 95% of ICD lead motion amplitudes were 9.5, 6.7, and 5.5 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The mean correlation error was 2.2 +/- 0.9 mm. Conclusions: Data from online tracking indicated motion irregularities and correlation errors, necessitating an increased CTV-PTV margin of 3 mm. In 35% of cases, the motion variability exceeded 3 mm in one or more directions. We recommend verifying the correlation between CTV and surrogate individually for every patient, especially for targets with posterobasal localization where we observed the highest difference between the lead and CTV motion.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherVia Medicacs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapycs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0020cs
dc.rights© 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Via Medica. All rights reserved.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/cs
dc.subjectventricular tachycardiacs
dc.subjectstereotactic body radiotherapycs
dc.titleReal-time measurement of ICD lead motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy of ventricular tachycardiacs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0020
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume26cs
dc.description.issue1cs
dc.description.lastpage137cs
dc.description.firstpage128cs
dc.identifier.wos000641613400016


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.  Published by Via Medica.  All rights reserved.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Via Medica. All rights reserved.