Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorČapková, Pavla
dc.contributor.authorPospíšil, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorMiehé-Brendlé, Jocelyn
dc.contributor.authorTrchová, Miroslava
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Zdeněk
dc.contributor.authorLe Dred, Ronan
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-08T06:28:15Z
dc.date.available2006-11-08T06:28:15Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Molecular Modeling. 2000, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 600-607.en
dc.identifier.issn1610-2940
dc.identifier.issn0948-5023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/57902
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Molecular Modelingen
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s0089400060600en
dc.subjectintercalated claysen
dc.subjecttetramethylammonium-claysen
dc.subjectmodelingen
dc.subjectmolecular mechanicsen
dc.subjectmontmorilloniteen
dc.subjectbeidelliteen
dc.titleMontmorillonite and beidellite intercalated with tetramethylammonium cationsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.locationNení ve fondu ÚKen
dc.description.abstract-enAbstract Molecular mechanics simulations, combined with X-ray powder diffraction and infrared spectroscopy, have been used in structure analysis of montmorillonite and beidellite intercalated with tetramethylammonium cations. A complex structure analysis provided us with the detailed structure model, including characterization of the disorder, the total sublimation energy and a charge distribution in the structure of intercalates. The calculated basal spacings (14.36 Å for TMA-montmorillonite and 14.12 Å for TMA-beidellite) are in good agreement with the experimental values (14.31 Å for TMA-montmorillonite and 14.147 Å for TMA-beidellite). Both intercalated structures exhibit positional and orientational disorder in the arrangement of TMA cations, and consequently disorder in layer-stacking. In the present work we analyse the effect of octahedral and tetrahedral substitutions in a 2:1 silicate layer on the arrangement of tetramethylammonium (TMA) cations in the interlayer space of montmorillonite and beidellite. The most significant difference between TMA-montmorillonite and TMA-beidellite is in the charge distribution on the TMA cations and silicate layer. The TMA-beidellite structure is highly polarized, the total charge on one TMA cation is +0.167 e–, while the total charge on the TMA cation in montmorillonite is +0.050 e–.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s0089400060600
dc.identifier.wos000168287700001


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam