| dc.contributor.author | Hauer, Tomáš | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-14T09:52:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-11-14T09:52:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1993 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Filosofický časopis. 1993, roč. 41, č. 3, s. 486-504. | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0015-1831 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/64095 | |
| dc.language.iso | cs | en |
| dc.publisher | Akademie věd České republiky, Filozofický ústav | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Filosofický časopis | en |
| dc.title | Toulání není bloumání : přirozený svět a postmodernismus | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Wandering is not gaping - postmodernism and the natural world | |
| dc.type | article | en |
| dc.identifier.location | Ve fondu ÚK | en |
| dc.description.abstract-en | The author seeks to explain his view of the "phenomenon of the natural world" (Husserl) in contrast to the post-modernism of V. Bělohradský. For Bělohradský, post-modernism is, associated with the "motif of wandering", which is said to be a characteristic feature of postmodernis. Accepting the motif of "wandering" as a mere slogan without searching for deeper insights can lead to "gaping". The author tries to grasp the motif of wandering according to his reference to inner circumstances. Wandering is therefore something more than merely a journey without an aim. It is a path back to the "real life out of habituated registering". It rests on examining a feeling of rejecting life in the mode of "occurring"; living and not merely undergoing life. How it is possible to gain experience of this "way we are"? In order to elucidate this experience, the author tries to explain the phenomena of "the moment" and "living within earshot". He meditates on Bělohradský's interpretation of the phenomenon of the natural world and argues with the metaphor which places the natural world on a level with the angels (as something stark and eternal). The idea of life in truth, opposed to the thesis of declaration compared with the declaration that there is no truth (it is building a lair) is shown in the same way as those concealed presumptions which direct the ideas of the author and of Bělohradský. According to the author it is Bělohradský's experience as a dissident in revealing totalitarianism that misdirects his reading of Husserl with respect to the modem world. Bělohradský's interpretation of post-modernism (the thesis that there is no truth) - which is different from Rorty's. for example - is, in the author's view, a sign of "tiredness". The author wants to reconsider post-modern tiredness so that "it could refresh us". | en |
| dc.identifier.wos | A1993MA12600007 | |