dc.contributor.author | Murín, Martin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-15T08:18:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-15T08:18:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Politická ekonomie. 2016, roč. 64, č. 2, s. 176-192. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 0032-3233 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2336-8225 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/111654 | |
dc.format.extent | 331429 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | sk | cs |
dc.publisher | Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Politická ekonomie | cs |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.vse.cz/polek/download.php?jnl=polek&pdf=1062.pdf | cs |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | fiscal deficit | cs |
dc.subject | economic growth | cs |
dc.subject | consolidation | cs |
dc.subject | government revenues | cs |
dc.subject | government expenditures | cs |
dc.title | Vplyv spôsobu tvorby fiškálneho deficitu na ekonomický rast | cs |
dc.title.alternative | The influence of fiscal deficit creation on economic growth | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.description.abstract-en | The discussion of influence of fiscal consolidation on economic growth is quite interesting and
important topic. Consequently, the main aim of the article is to determine diff erences within the
influence of fiscal deficit on the economic growth, which is caused by changes in certain groups of
government expenditures and revenues. We focus on two different economic growth indicators.
The first is growth rate of real GDP and the second is growth rate of potential output. The panel
regression method is used which data covers 13 old EU member states in 1996 to 2013. We employ
the omitted fiscal variable approach. There is a hint that every deficit to revenue substitution has
no significant growth effect. The results of expenditures imply, that government should reduce
deficit created by debt service. The measure has relatively stronger effect on supply side. Potential
output growth can also be supported by the deficit decrease of social expenditures. Lowering
government consumption is detrimental to GDP, but it is not to potential output. There are
some differences between results of two types of growth. Hence government should decide,
if consolidation effect is considered against GDP or potential output at first. | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18267/j.polek.1062 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 64 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 2 | cs |
dc.description.lastpage | 192 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | 176 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000375021600004 | |