Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorToloo, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorAllahyar, Maryam
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-18T05:01:47Z
dc.date.available2018-04-18T05:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMeasurement. 2018, vol. 121, p. 327-334.cs
dc.identifier.issn0263-2241
dc.identifier.issn1873-412X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/126099
dc.description.abstractToloo and Tichy (2015) with the aim of holding the rule of thumb in data envelopment analysis, developed a pair of models which optimally chooses some inputs and outputs among selective measures under variable returns to scale assumption. Their approach involves a lower bound for the input and output weights in the multiplier model and a penalty term in the objective function of envelopment model. These models possess an epsilon which on the one hand turns the selecting envelopment model non-linear and on the other hand increases the required computational burden for solving the selecting multiplier models. Selecting an improper value for the epsilon may cause the infeasibility and unboundedness issues for the multiplier and envelopment model, respectively. This paper demonstrates that the method of Toloo and Tichy (2015) is valid even with excluding the epsilon. The method is extended to generalized returns to scale model which considers other returns to scale assumptions, i.e. non-increasing, constant, and non-decreasing. The obtained results point out that the simplified approach is more stable and more reliable and substantially reduces the required calculations.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherElseviercs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMeasurementcs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.056
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.cs
dc.subjectdata envelopment analysiscs
dc.subjectgeneralized returns to scale modelscs
dc.subjectthe rule of thumbcs
dc.subjectselective measurescs
dc.titleA simplification generalized returns to scale approach for selecting performance measures in data envelopment analysiscs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.056
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume121cs
dc.description.lastpage334cs
dc.description.firstpage327cs
dc.identifier.wos000428720700034


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam