Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorJarošová, Eva
dc.contributor.authorNoskievičová, Darja
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T12:13:34Z
dc.date.available2019-10-08T12:13:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationE + M Ekonomie a Management. 2019, vol. 22, issue 2, p. 68-82.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609
dc.identifier.issn2336-5064
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/138818
dc.description.abstractWhen a high-quality process is to be controlled by 100% inspection and yes-no decision is employed, several types of charts come into account, e.g. CCC, CCC-r or geometric CUSUM (CCC-CUSUM). The aim of the paper is to examine performance of these charts so that a suitable one can be chosen for a given process. The charts are compared according to the quickness with which the upward shift in the fraction of nonconforming items is detected. The average number of observations to signal (ANOS) instead of the usual average run length (ARL) is determined. While ANOS for CCC or CCC-r charts can be easily calculated based on a geometric or a negative binomial distribution, its computation is quite difficult in the case of CCC-CUSUM chart. The corrected diffusion (CD) approximation was used to determine ANOS and the results were verified by Monte Carlo simulation. Zero-state and steady-state (both fixed-shift and random-shift model) analyses were performed to take different scenarios of the process shift occurrence into account. CCC-3 or CCC-2 and CCC-CUSUM charts were compared. The order r for CCC-r chart was chosen as an optimal value for the given process based on the semi-economic model suggested in Brodecka (2013). Our study revealed that for in-control c o equal to 0.0002 the CCC-CUSUM chart performs best especially for shifts around the pre-specified out-of-control fraction nonconforming. The CCC-r chart may be comparable or even better in detecting larger shifts. The results of the comparative study were utilized for the choice of the most suitable and best performing control chart to control the high-yield process producing ERG (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) sensors. Comparisons of CCC-r and CCC-CUSUM charts can be found elsewhere in literature, but conclusions seem to be rather inconsistent. To our best knowledge no study dealing with such small in-control fraction nonconforming together with the low risk of false alarm has been published yet. The choice of CUSUM's parameters and consequent values of ANOS can help practitioners who need to control high-quality processes.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE + M Ekonomie a Managementcs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-2-005cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/cs
dc.subjectCCC chartcs
dc.subjectCCC-r chartcs
dc.subjectCCC-CUSUM chartcs
dc.subjectANOScs
dc.subjectzero-state scenariocs
dc.subjectfixed shift steady-state scenariocs
dc.subjectrandom shift steady-state scenariocs
dc.subjectsimulationcs
dc.titleComparative statistical analysis of selected control charts for highly capable processescs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2019-2-005
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume22cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.lastpage82cs
dc.description.firstpage68cs
dc.identifier.wos000482727500005


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/