Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorLi, Yingzhi
dc.contributor.authorMatocha, Karel
dc.contributor.authorHurst, Roger
dc.contributor.authorČížek, Petr
dc.contributor.authorTurba, Krystof
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17T05:24:43Z
dc.date.available2019-10-17T05:24:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2019, vol. 102, p. 16-29.cs
dc.identifier.issn0167-8442
dc.identifier.issn1872-7638
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/138866
dc.description.abstractThe main tasks of the small punch (SP) technique are to derive standard material properties from a limited amount of material, including strength/toughness, creep and fatigue behaviour etc. The complicated problem of determining fracture toughness poses significant difficulties. Although many methods have been put forward to increase the prediction accuracy, no satisfactory methods are available yet. Recently, the so-called "Local approach" has been introduced to determine ductile fracture from the small punch test by means of a micro-mechanical model introduced by Gurson and modified by Needleman and Tvergaard. By using the observed load-deflection curve from the small punch test, reverse finite element analysis is performed to identify both the material plastic property (a-e curve) and the damage parameters of the Gurson model. With these material parameters known, a standard fracture toughness (CT) specimen is simulated by finite element analyses, from which the J-integral and the crack extension can be estimated. A J-R resistance curve can be created by multiple specimens with different load-line-displacements, and the fracture toughness J(IC) can be determined according to ASTM E 1820-17. In order to verify this new approach, the standard uniaxial test, the small punch tests and the standard fracture toughness tests are needed with the same material. Up to now, only a few of these kinds of experimental verification are available. In this paper, an overview on the existing methods of determination of fracture toughness from small punch test is given, and the "Local approach" for small punch test is addressed. Verifications are summarized from three high level institutes, including MMT in the Czech Republic, JRC Petten in the Netherlands and EPRI in the USA. The predicted J(IC) with that from standard fracture toughness tests are compared. A good agreement is found and shows that the "Local approach" is capable of predicting fracture toughness from small punch tests. The prediction accuracy by "Local approach" is better than existing methods. Further work is needed as available tests are still limited.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherElseviercs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTheoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanicscs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.03.015cs
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.cs
dc.subjectsmall punch testcs
dc.subjectfracture toughnesscs
dc.subjectJ-R resistance curvecs
dc.subjectreverse finite element analysiscs
dc.subject"Local approach"cs
dc.subjectGurson modelcs
dc.subjectexperimental verificationcs
dc.titleExperimental verification to determine fracture toughness from the small punch test using "Local approach"cs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.03.015
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume102cs
dc.description.lastpage29cs
dc.description.firstpage16cs
dc.identifier.wos000480512300003


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam