dc.contributor.author | Libich, Jan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-14T07:08:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-14T07:08:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Economic Record. 2020, vol. 96, issue 312, p. 19-39. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 0013-0249 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1475-4932 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/139404 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper shows that the recent trend of separating macroprudential and monetary policies (M&Ms) into two autonomous institutions is undesirable. A strategic (game of chicken type) conflict is likely to occur, whereby each M&M ignores exuberant credit booms, trying to induce the other institution to tighten conditions. This has been observed, for example, in Sweden and Norway after 2010. We postulate a generalised concept of stochastic leadership and argue that greater rigidities give the prudential authority the upper hand strategically on the central bank. We show how this leads to a second type of unpleasant monetarist arithmetic and costly economic fluctuations. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Wiley | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Economic Record | cs |
dc.relation.uri | http://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12520 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2019 Economic Society of Australia | cs |
dc.title | Unpleasant monetarist arithmetic: Macroprudential edition | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1475-4932.12520 | |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 96 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 312 | cs |
dc.description.lastpage | 39 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | 19 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000517978800002 | |