Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorLibich, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T07:08:09Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T07:08:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Record. 2020, vol. 96, issue 312, p. 19-39.cs
dc.identifier.issn0013-0249
dc.identifier.issn1475-4932
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/139404
dc.description.abstractThis paper shows that the recent trend of separating macroprudential and monetary policies (M&Ms) into two autonomous institutions is undesirable. A strategic (game of chicken type) conflict is likely to occur, whereby each M&M ignores exuberant credit booms, trying to induce the other institution to tighten conditions. This has been observed, for example, in Sweden and Norway after 2010. We postulate a generalised concept of stochastic leadership and argue that greater rigidities give the prudential authority the upper hand strategically on the central bank. We show how this leads to a second type of unpleasant monetarist arithmetic and costly economic fluctuations.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherWileycs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEconomic Recordcs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12520cs
dc.rights© 2019 Economic Society of Australiacs
dc.titleUnpleasant monetarist arithmetic: Macroprudential editioncs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1475-4932.12520
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume96cs
dc.description.issue312cs
dc.description.lastpage39cs
dc.description.firstpage19cs
dc.identifier.wos000517978800002


Soubory tohoto záznamu

SouboryVelikostFormátZobrazit

K tomuto záznamu nejsou připojeny žádné soubory.

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam