Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorVaněk, Michal
dc.contributor.authorValverde, Gregorio Fidalgo
dc.contributor.authorČerný, Igor
dc.contributor.authorHudeček, Vlastimil
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-07T08:38:26Z
dc.date.available2020-10-07T08:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationActa Montanistica Slovaca. 2020, vol. 25, issue 2, p. 170-181.cs
dc.identifier.issn1335-1788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/142276
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with the management of coal handling operational risks related to the transport of stripped overburden in giant brown coal pit quarries. It aims to identify and analyze the operational risks of currently applied continuous conveyance and to consider alternative transport, i.e., discontinuous transport. The Ishikawa diagram was used to identify the degree of operational risks affecting the net present value in both transport technologies. The operational risks examined were: human factor, suppliers, legislation, technology, environment, and market. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was then used to evaluate the operational risks of continuous and discontinuous overburden transport technologies. The data for the analyses were obtained by means of a survey among experts in the field. The analyses show that the most significant operational risks of continuous transport are: lower demand for coal, an increase in the investment costs, conveyance breakdowns, the quality of the transported material, and work attitude. In the discontinuous technology, the identified operational risks were: increases in the cost of fuels, road maintenance and costs of tires, low-qualified labor; and work attitude. The comparison of the two examined technologies shows that discontinuous transport technology involves more operational risks than the continuous one.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita Košice, Fakulta baníctva, ekológie, riadenia a geotechnológiícs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Montanistica Slovacacs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i2.4cs
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectcoal handlingcs
dc.subjectoperational riskcs
dc.subjectbrown coalcs
dc.subjectIshikawa diagramcs
dc.subjectFMEAcs
dc.subjectstripped overburden transportcs
dc.titleCoal handling operational risk management: Stripped overburden transport in brown coal open pit minescs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.46544/AMS.v25i2.4
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume25cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.lastpage181cs
dc.description.firstpage170cs
dc.identifier.wos000555106000004


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© 2020 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © 2020 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.