Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartinek, Radek
dc.contributor.authorBarnová, Kateřina
dc.contributor.authorJaroš, René
dc.contributor.authorKahánková, Radana
dc.contributor.authorKupka, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorJezewski, Michal
dc.contributor.authorCzabanski, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMatonia, Adam
dc.contributor.authorJezewski, Janusz
dc.contributor.authorHoroba, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T10:25:03Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T10:25:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Access. 2020, vol. 8, p. 221942-221962.cs
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/142883
dc.description.abstractFetal phonocardiography (fPCG) is a non-invasive technique for detection of fetal heart sounds (fHSs), murmurs and vibrations. This acoustic recording is passive and provides an alternative low-cost method to ultrasonographic cardiotocography (CTG). Unfortunately, the fPCG signal is often disturbed by the wide range of artifacts that make it difficult to obtain significant diagnostic information from this signal. The study focuses on the filtering of an fPCG signal containing three types of noise (ambient noise, Gaussian noise, and movement artifacts of the mother and the fetus) having different amplitudes. Three advanced signal processing methods: empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), and adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) were tested and compared. The evaluation of the extraction was performed by determining the accuracy of S1 sounds detection and by determining the fetal heart rate (fHR). The evaluation of the effectiveness of the method was performed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean error of heart interval measurement ((vertical bar Delta T-i vertical bar) over bar), and the statistical parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). Using the EMD method, ACC > 95% was achieved in 7 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC D 88 :73%, SE D 91 :57%, PPV D 94 :80% and F1 D 93 :12%. Using the EEMD method, ACC > 95% was achieved in 9 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC D 97 :49%, SE D 97 :89%, PPV D 99 :53% and F1 D 98 :69%. In this study, the best results were achieved using the AWT method, which provided ACC > 95% in all 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC D 99 :34%, SE D 99 :49%, PPV D 99 :85% a F1 D 99 :67%.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherIEEEcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE Accesscs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043496cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectfetal phonocardiography (fPCG)cs
dc.subjectfetal heart rate (fHR)cs
dc.subjectnon-invasive fetal monitoringcs
dc.subjectempirical mode decomposition (EMD)cs
dc.subjectensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD)cs
dc.subjectadaptive wavelet transform (AWT)cs
dc.titlePassive fetal monitoring by advanced signal processing methods in fetal phonocardiographycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043496
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume8cs
dc.description.lastpage221962cs
dc.description.firstpage221942cs
dc.identifier.wos000600842600001


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/