Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGryga, Michal
dc.contributor.authorCiprian, Dalibor
dc.contributor.authorHlubina, Petr
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-26T08:34:20Z
dc.date.available2021-02-26T08:34:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSensors. 2020, vol. 20, issue 18, art. no. 5119.cs
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/142887
dc.description.abstractWe report on a highly sensitive measurement of the relative humidity (RH) of moist air using both the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and Bloch surface wave resonance (BSWR). Both resonances are resolved in the Kretschmann configuration when the wavelength interrogation method is utilized. The SPR is revealed for a multilayer plasmonic structure of SF10/Cr/Au, while the BSWR is resolved for a multilayer dielectric structure (MDS) comprising four bilayers of TiO2/SiO2with a rough termination layer of TiO2. The SPR effect is manifested by a dip in the reflectance of ap-polarized wave, and a shift of the dip with the change in the RH, or equivalently with the change in the refractive index of moist air is revealed, giving a sensitivity in a range of 0.042-0.072 nm/%RH. The BSWR effect is manifested by a dip in the reflectance of the spectral interference ofs- andp-polarized waves, which represents an effective approach in resolving the resonance with maximum depth. For the MDS under study, the BSWRs were resolved within two band gaps, and for moist air we obtained sensitivities of 0.021-0.038 nm/%RH and 0.046-0.065 nm/%RH, respectively. We also revealed that the SPR based RH measurement is with the figure of merit (FOM) up to 4.7 x 10(-4)%RH-1, while BSWR based measurements have FOMs as high as 3.0 x 10-3%RH-1and 1.1 x 10(-3)%RH-1, respectively. The obtained spectral interferometry based results demonstrate that the BSWR based sensor employing the available MDS has a similar sensitivity as the SPR based sensor, but outperforms it in the FOM. BSW based sensors employing dielectrics thus represent an effective alternative with a number of advantages, including better mechanical and chemical stability than metal films used in SPR sensing.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSensorscs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.3390/s20185119cs
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectBloch surface wave resonancecs
dc.subjectsurface plasmon resonancecs
dc.subjectKretschmann configurationcs
dc.subjectmultilayer plasmonic structurecs
dc.subjectmultilayer dielectric structurecs
dc.subjectspectral interferencecs
dc.subjectmoist aircs
dc.subjectsensitivitycs
dc.subjectfigure of meritcs
dc.titleBloch surface wave resonance based sensors as an alternative to surface plasmon resonance sensorscs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s20185119
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume20cs
dc.description.issue18cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 5119cs
dc.identifier.wos000580711900001


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.