Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorŠikolová, Soňa
dc.contributor.authorUrík, Milan
dc.contributor.authorHošnová, Dagmar
dc.contributor.authorKruntorád, Vít
dc.contributor.authorBartoš, Michal
dc.contributor.authorMotyka, Oldřich
dc.contributor.authorJabandžiev, Petr
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T12:54:19Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T12:54:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2021.cs
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/145687
dc.description.abstractPurpose The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. Methods Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). Results The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3 degrees to 16 degrees and from 26.2 degrees to 17.6 degrees, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. Conclusion The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherSpringer Naturecs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologycs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-xcs
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021, The Author(s)cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectactive transcutaneous bone conduction implantcs
dc.subjectchildrencs
dc.subjectquality of lifecs
dc.subjectatresiacs
dc.subjectlocalisationcs
dc.subjecthearing outcomescs
dc.titleTwo Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in childrencs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.identifier.wos000695739900001


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

Copyright © 2021, The Author(s)
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je Copyright © 2021, The Author(s)