Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŠtembírek, Jan
dc.contributor.authorČermáková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorKulnig, Michal
dc.contributor.authorHurník, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorCvek, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorResová, Kamila
dc.contributor.authorJonszta, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorLitschmanová, Martina
dc.contributor.authorStránský, Jiří
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-27T07:28:21Z
dc.date.available2022-04-27T07:28:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBiomedical Papers. 2021, vol. 165, issue 2, p. 224-228.cs
dc.identifier.issn1213-8118
dc.identifier.issn1804-7521
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/146078
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the orofacial area, the presence of cervical metastases represents a single most significant prognostic factor. This fact underlines the importance of thorough examination of the cervical lymph nodes for potential tumor involvement. To verify this, the most common investigative methods are physical examination (PE), sonography (US) and computed tomography (CT), which have also been used to assess the stage of the disease in the patients in our research. Objective. To evaluate the performance of individual methods (physical examination, sonography, computed tomography) and combinations. Method. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, who had undergone physical, US and CT examinations at our department followed by radical neck dissection were included in this retrospective study. A total of 57 patients were included. Results. The sensitivity of PE, US and CT were 38%, 69% and 61%, respectively, however CT+US combination yielded 83% sensitivity and combination of all these methods 86% sensitivity. The number of false positives was however relatively high with specificity of the 3-way combination at 65%. Conclusion. A combination of our three widely available inexpensive methods detected 86% of metastases in cervical nodes. The large number of false positives however indicates that the method should rather be used for screening in selecting patients who need additional and more expensive imaging than for diagnosing cervical metastases. Also, as 14% of cervical metastases pass undetected using our method, we would recommend an additional examination at least by US+PE several weeks to a few months after the initial examination.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherUniverzita Palackého v Olomoucics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiomedical Paperscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.026cs
dc.rights© 2021 The Authorscs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectsquamous cell carcinomacs
dc.subjectoral cavitycs
dc.subjectcervical metastasescs
dc.subjectradical neck dissectioncs
dc.subjectsonographycs
dc.subjectcomputed tomographycs
dc.titleThe use of a battery of examination methods for detection of cervical metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavitycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.5507/bp.2020.026
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume165cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.lastpage228cs
dc.description.firstpage224cs
dc.identifier.wos000660244900019


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 The Authors