Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorMilošević, Mijodrag
dc.contributor.authorČep, Robert
dc.contributor.authorČepová, Lenka
dc.contributor.authorLukić, Dejan
dc.contributor.authorAntić, Aco
dc.contributor.authorDjurdjev, Mica
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-10T10:20:41Z
dc.date.available2022-05-10T10:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMaterials. 2021, vol. 14, issue 23, art. no. 7360.cs
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/146134
dc.description.abstractProcess planning optimization is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial problem extensively studied in the scientific community. Its main components include operation sequencing, selection of manufacturing resources and determination of appropriate setup plans. These problems require metaheuristic-based approaches in order to be effectively and efficiently solved. Therefore, to optimize the complex process planning problem, a novel hybrid grey wolf optimizer (HGWO) is proposed. The traditional grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is improved by employing genetic strategies such as selection, crossover and mutation which enhance global search abilities and convergence of the traditional GWO. Precedence relationships among machining operations are taken into account and precedence constraints are modeled using operation precedence graphs and adjacency matrices. Constraint handling heuristic procedure is adopted to move infeasible solutions to a feasible domain. Minimization of the total weighted machining cost of a process plan is adopted as the objective and three experimental studies that consider three different prismatic parts are conducted. Comparative analysis of the obtained cost values, as well as the convergence analysis, are performed and the HGWO approach demonstrated effectiveness and flexibility in finding optimal and near-optimal process plans. On the other side, comparative analysis of computational times and execution times of certain MATLAB functions showed that the HGWO have good time efficiency but limited since it requires more time compared to considered hybrid and traditional algorithms. Potential directions to improving efficiency and performances of the proposed approach are given in conclusions.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaterialscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237360cs
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectprocess planning optimizationcs
dc.subjectgrey wolf optimizercs
dc.subjectprecedence constraintscs
dc.subjectconstraint handlingcs
dc.subjectselectioncs
dc.subjectcrossovercs
dc.subjectmutationcs
dc.titleA hybrid grey wolf optimizer for process planning optimization with precedence constraintscs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma14237360
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume14cs
dc.description.issue23cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 7360cs
dc.identifier.wos000735678600001


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.