dc.contributor.author | Rajendran, Shankar | |
dc.contributor.author | Ganesh, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Čep, Robert | |
dc.contributor.author | Narayanan, R. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pal, Subham | |
dc.contributor.author | Kalita, Kanak | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-21T11:07:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-21T11:07:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Processes. 2022, vol. 10, issue 2, art. no. 197. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 2227-9717 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/146300 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, several high-performance nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms have been proposed. It is important to study and compare the convergence, computational burden and statistical significance of these metaheuristics to aid future developments. This study focuses on six recent metaheuristics, namely, ant lion optimization (ALO), arithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA), dragonfly algorithm (DA), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), salp swarm algorithm (SSA) and whale optimization algorithm (WOA). Optimization of an industrial machining application is tackled in this paper. The optimal machining parameters (peak current, duty factor, wire tension and water pressure) of WEDM are predicted using the six aforementioned metaheuristics. The objective functions of the optimization study are to maximize the material removal rate (MRR) and minimize the wear ratio (WR) and surface roughness (SR). All of the current algorithms have been seen to surpass existing results, thereby indicating their superiority over conventional optimization algorithms. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | MDPI | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Processes | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020197 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | optimization | cs |
dc.subject | non-traditional algorithms | cs |
dc.subject | process optimization | cs |
dc.subject | process parameters | cs |
dc.subject | algorithms | cs |
dc.title | A conceptual comparison of six nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms in process optimization | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/pr10020197 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 10 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 2 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | art. no. 197 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000778142900001 | |