Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorJohanides, Marek
dc.contributor.authorLokaj, Antonín
dc.contributor.authorMikolášek, David
dc.contributor.authorMynarčík, Petr
dc.contributor.authorDobeš, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorSucharda, Oldřich
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-05T12:39:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-05T12:39:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBuildings. 2022, vol. 12, issue 5, art. no. 583.cs
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/148577
dc.description.abstractThe present study deals with the innovation and the possibilities of improving the design solution of a frame connection for two selected types of fasteners. All specimens were made of glued laminated timber. Dowel-type mechanical fasteners, a combination of bolts and dowels, and full-threaded screws were used for the connection. The main goal of this research was to replace the typical solution (common dowel-type fasteners) with a more modern, faster, and easier solution in order to improve the load-carrying capacity, ductility, and deformation capacity of this type of frame connection. This article also aimed to provide a detailed evaluation of the mechanical properties of the used glued laminated timber and fasteners in order to comprehensively evaluate the research task. For the design solution, a frame connection created from a system of two struts and a partition was chosen as the basis of the experimental program. Dowel-type mechanical fasteners, as well as combinations of bolts and dowels, were used for the connection; however, in addition to these standardly used mechanical fasteners, full-threaded screws were used. The article describes the use of static destructive testing to determine the ductility of the connection, considering different variations in the strengthening of the individual segments of the mentioned connection means. In the first variation, the individual components of the frame were not reinforced in any way. In the second, the crossbar was reinforced with two full-threaded bolts. In the third, the webs and the crossbar were reinforced with two full-threaded bolts. In the article, these ductility values were compared with each other and the procedure was set by the currently valid standard.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuildingscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050583cs
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectductilitycs
dc.subjectload capacitycs
dc.subjecttimbercs
dc.subjectframe connectioncs
dc.subjectscrewscs
dc.subjectbolts and dowelscs
dc.subjectglued laminated timbercs
dc.titleTimber semirigid frame connection with improved deformation capacity and ductilitycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings12050583
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume12cs
dc.description.issue5cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 583cs
dc.identifier.wos000802540800001


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.