dc.contributor.author | Opěla, Petr | |
dc.contributor.author | Schindler, Ivo | |
dc.contributor.author | Kawulok, Petr | |
dc.contributor.author | Kawulok, Rostislav | |
dc.contributor.author | Rusz, Stanislav | |
dc.contributor.author | Sauer, Michal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-01T13:30:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-01T13:30:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Materials & Design. 2022, vol. 220, art. no. 110880. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 0264-1275 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-4197 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/148944 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the utilization of artificial neural networks (ANNs) as regression models to solve the issue of hot flow stress forecasting has become a standard approach. In a connection with this kind of regression issue, employed ANNs are usually learned via a shallow learning technique while only limited attention has been paid to a deep learning method. In the frame of the submitted research, the shallow learning approach is thoroughly compared to the deep learning techniques which are based on the use of a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and an Auto-Encoder (AE). To do so, these learning techniques are applied on a feed-forward multi-layer ANN describing the experimental hot flow curve dataset of micro-alloyed medium carbon steel. In comparison with the shallow learning method, both deep learning approaches provided higher accuracy in the network response - especially in the case of a higher number of hidden layers. The results have also shown that neither the RBM-based deep learning method nor the AE-based method had a significant effect on the duration of the necessary calculations. However, it turned out that the RBM-based method can, under certain conditions, lead to a more reliable network performance. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Materials & Design | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110880 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | artificial neural network | cs |
dc.subject | deep learning techniques | cs |
dc.subject | deep belief network | cs |
dc.subject | restricted Boltzmann machine | cs |
dc.subject | auto-encoder | cs |
dc.subject | hot deformation behavior | cs |
dc.title | Shallow and deep learning of an artificial neural network model describing a hot flow stress Evolution: A comparative study | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110880 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 220 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | art. no. 110880 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000861662000001 | |