Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOpěla, Petr
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Ivo
dc.contributor.authorKawulok, Petr
dc.contributor.authorKawulok, Rostislav
dc.contributor.authorRusz, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorSauer, Michal
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T13:30:49Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T13:30:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMaterials & Design. 2022, vol. 220, art. no. 110880.cs
dc.identifier.issn0264-1275
dc.identifier.issn1873-4197
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/148944
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the utilization of artificial neural networks (ANNs) as regression models to solve the issue of hot flow stress forecasting has become a standard approach. In a connection with this kind of regression issue, employed ANNs are usually learned via a shallow learning technique while only limited attention has been paid to a deep learning method. In the frame of the submitted research, the shallow learning approach is thoroughly compared to the deep learning techniques which are based on the use of a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and an Auto-Encoder (AE). To do so, these learning techniques are applied on a feed-forward multi-layer ANN describing the experimental hot flow curve dataset of micro-alloyed medium carbon steel. In comparison with the shallow learning method, both deep learning approaches provided higher accuracy in the network response - especially in the case of a higher number of hidden layers. The results have also shown that neither the RBM-based deep learning method nor the AE-based method had a significant effect on the duration of the necessary calculations. However, it turned out that the RBM-based method can, under certain conditions, lead to a more reliable network performance.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherElseviercs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaterials & Designcs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110880cs
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/cs
dc.subjectartificial neural networkcs
dc.subjectdeep learning techniquescs
dc.subjectdeep belief networkcs
dc.subjectrestricted Boltzmann machinecs
dc.subjectauto-encodercs
dc.subjecthot deformation behaviorcs
dc.titleShallow and deep learning of an artificial neural network model describing a hot flow stress Evolution: A comparative studycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110880
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume220cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 110880cs
dc.identifier.wos000861662000001


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.