dc.contributor.author | Szweda, Zofia | |
dc.contributor.author | Gołaszewski, Jacek | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghosh, Pratanu | |
dc.contributor.author | Lehner, Petr | |
dc.contributor.author | Konečný, Petr | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-08T08:56:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-08T08:56:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Materials. 2023, vol. 16, issue 2, art. no. 637. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-1944 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/151480 | |
dc.description.abstract | This research paper is the result of observations made during tests according to various
standards carried out on behalf of industry. The article presents diffusion coefficient values calculated
according to the thermodynamic migration model for twenty different concrete mixes and some
selected mixes of the codified approaches known as ASTM 1202, NT BUILD 443, NT BUILD 492,
ASTM 1556. The method used here, according to the thermodynamic model of migration, allows
determination of the value of the diffusion coefficient after short studies of the migration of chloride
ions into concrete and was described in earlier works by one of the authors. Unfortunately, when
using standard methods, the values of diffusion coefficients differ significantly from each other. In
each concrete, diffusion tests were carried out in the conditions of long-term natural diffusion to
verify the values determined by standard methods and according to the thermodynamic model of
migration. The analysis conducted for this research paper reveals that the chloride permeability
test method according to the standard ASTM C1202-97 has an almost 2.8-fold greater dispersion
of the obtained results compared to the thermodynamic model of migration. It was observed that
the standard NT BUILD 492 has a 3.8-fold dispersion of results compared to the method with the
thermodynamic model of migration. The most time-consuming method is the standard method NT
BUILD 443. The largest 3.5-fold dispersion of values concerning the reference value are observed in
that method. Moreover, a method based on a thermodynamic migration model seems to be the best
option of all analyzed methods. It is a quite quick, but laborious, method that should be tested for a
larger number of concrete mixes. A great advantage of this method is that it is promising for a wide
range of concrete mixtures, both plain concrete and concrete with various additives and admixtures,
as well as high-performance concrete. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | MDPI | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Materials | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020637 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | diffusion coefficient | cs |
dc.subject | diffusion model | cs |
dc.subject | chloride migration | cs |
dc.subject | standard methods | cs |
dc.subject | chloride ions | cs |
dc.subject | Fick’s second law | cs |
dc.title | Comparison of standardized methods for determining the diffusion coefficient of chloride in concrete with thermodynamic model of migration | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ma16020637 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 16 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 2 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | art. no. 637 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000918245800001 | |