Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSzweda, Zofia
dc.contributor.authorGołaszewski, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Pratanu
dc.contributor.authorLehner, Petr
dc.contributor.authorKonečný, Petr
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T08:56:29Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T08:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMaterials. 2023, vol. 16, issue 2, art. no. 637.cs
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/151480
dc.description.abstractThis research paper is the result of observations made during tests according to various standards carried out on behalf of industry. The article presents diffusion coefficient values calculated according to the thermodynamic migration model for twenty different concrete mixes and some selected mixes of the codified approaches known as ASTM 1202, NT BUILD 443, NT BUILD 492, ASTM 1556. The method used here, according to the thermodynamic model of migration, allows determination of the value of the diffusion coefficient after short studies of the migration of chloride ions into concrete and was described in earlier works by one of the authors. Unfortunately, when using standard methods, the values of diffusion coefficients differ significantly from each other. In each concrete, diffusion tests were carried out in the conditions of long-term natural diffusion to verify the values determined by standard methods and according to the thermodynamic model of migration. The analysis conducted for this research paper reveals that the chloride permeability test method according to the standard ASTM C1202-97 has an almost 2.8-fold greater dispersion of the obtained results compared to the thermodynamic model of migration. It was observed that the standard NT BUILD 492 has a 3.8-fold dispersion of results compared to the method with the thermodynamic model of migration. The most time-consuming method is the standard method NT BUILD 443. The largest 3.5-fold dispersion of values concerning the reference value are observed in that method. Moreover, a method based on a thermodynamic migration model seems to be the best option of all analyzed methods. It is a quite quick, but laborious, method that should be tested for a larger number of concrete mixes. A great advantage of this method is that it is promising for a wide range of concrete mixtures, both plain concrete and concrete with various additives and admixtures, as well as high-performance concrete.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaterialscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020637cs
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectdiffusion coefficientcs
dc.subjectdiffusion modelcs
dc.subjectchloride migrationcs
dc.subjectstandard methodscs
dc.subjectchloride ionscs
dc.subjectFick’s second lawcs
dc.titleComparison of standardized methods for determining the diffusion coefficient of chloride in concrete with thermodynamic model of migrationcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma16020637
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume16cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 637cs
dc.identifier.wos000918245800001


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.