dc.contributor.author | Jespersen, Bjørn | |
dc.contributor.author | Carrara, Massimiliano | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-22T08:08:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-22T08:08:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Organon F. 2023, vol. 30, issue 1, p. 53-65. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1335-0668 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2585-7150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/151933 | |
dc.description.abstract | This note disambiguates the predicate ‘is an unknowable
event’ and shows how Transparent Intensional Logic interprets the
sentences “Agent a is calculating the final decimal of π” and “Agent
a has calculated the final decimal of π”. The knowability paradox is
used to set the stage. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Slovenská akadémia vied, Filozofický ústav. Akademie věd České republiky, Filosofický ústav. | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Organon F | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2023.30104 | cs |
dc.rights | © The Author. Journal compilation © The Editorial Board, Organon F. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode | cs |
dc.subject | impossibility | cs |
dc.subject | event | cs |
dc.subject | knowability paradox | cs |
dc.title | Impossible events and the knowability paradox | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.31577/orgf.2023.30104 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 30 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 1 | cs |
dc.description.lastpage | 65 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | 53 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000975082100004 | |