dc.contributor.author | Akhtar, Saima | |
dc.contributor.author | Shahzad, Sulman | |
dc.contributor.author | Zaheer, Asad | |
dc.contributor.author | Ullah, Hafiz Sami | |
dc.contributor.author | Kilic, Heybet | |
dc.contributor.author | Goňo, Radomír | |
dc.contributor.author | Jasiński, Michał | |
dc.contributor.author | Leonowicz, Zbigniew | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-07T13:23:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-07T13:23:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Energies. 2023, vol. 16, issue 10, art. no. 4060. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-1073 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/152008 | |
dc.description.abstract | Short-term load forecasting (STLF) is critical for the energy industry. Accurate predictions
of future electricity demand are necessary to ensure power systems’ reliable and efficient operation.
Various STLF models have been proposed in recent years, each with strengths and weaknesses. This
paper comprehensively reviews some STLF models, including time series, artificial neural networks
(ANNs), regression-based, and hybrid models. It first introduces the fundamental concepts and
challenges of STLF, then discusses each model class’s main features and assumptions. The paper
compares the models in terms of their accuracy, robustness, computational efficiency, scalability, and
adaptability and identifies each approach’s advantages and limitations. Although this study suggests
that ANNs and hybrid models may be the most promising ways to achieve accurate and reliable
STLF, additional research is required to handle multiple input features, manage massive data sets,
and adjust to shifting energy conditions. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | MDPI | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Energies | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104060 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | short-term load forecasting | cs |
dc.subject | neural networks | cs |
dc.subject | time series | cs |
dc.subject | autoregression | cs |
dc.subject | deep learning | cs |
dc.subject | artificial intelligence | cs |
dc.subject | support vector machines | cs |
dc.subject | hybrid models | cs |
dc.subject | exponential smoothing | cs |
dc.subject | data quality | cs |
dc.subject | random forest | cs |
dc.subject | decision tree | cs |
dc.subject | ensemble methods | cs |
dc.title | Short-term load forecasting models: A review of challenges, progress, and the road ahead | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/en16104060 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 16 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 10 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | art. no. 4060 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 000996871600001 | |