dc.contributor.author | Viswanath, Jagadeesan | |
dc.contributor.author | Thilagavathi, Rajamanickam | |
dc.contributor.author | Schindlerová, Vladimíra | |
dc.contributor.author | Subbarayan, Sreelakshmi | |
dc.contributor.author | Čep, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-22T09:51:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-22T09:51:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mathematics. 2023, vol. 11, issue 18, art. no. 3986. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 2227-7390 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/152394 | |
dc.description.abstract | A study of two warehouse inventory systems with a production unit is developed in this
article with some constraints which are of practical applicability to optimize the total production
cycle and its cost. A production unit evolves in three different states to retain its quality and prolong
its lifetime: the state of producing items, the state of reworking the identified defective items, and
the state of being idle. It processes the items up to a certain time point. The screening process starts
immediately after a product comes out of the production unit. The classified non-defective items are
first stored in own warehouse (OW), after filling to its maximum capacity, and the remaining items
fill in the first block (RW1) of the rental warehouse (RW). All identified defective items are stored in
the second block (RW2) of RW. The holding cost of an item is higher in RW than OW. All defective
items are sent to the production unit for re-do processes as a single lot immediately after the stop of
the production and re-do items are stored in RW1
to satisfy the demand. The items in the RW1 are
of higher priority in satisfying the demands after the stop of the production unit in producing new
items as to deduce the total cost. Demand is assumed as both time and advertisement dependent and
is encouraged once production starts. The deterioration rate differs in both warehouses. No backlog
is entertained. The study is directed to achieve optimum total cycle cost towards the attainment of
the optimum production time slot and the entire cycle of the system. We have arrived at explicit
expressions for the total cost function of the entire production cycle. An analytic optimization process
of the discriminant method is employed in the form of an algorithm to arrive at the optimum total
cost. It provides a numerical illustration of a specific environment. The implications of the current
research work are as follows. The optimum utility of production units in three different states in
arriving at the optimum total cost is extensively studied with respect to deterioration, demand, and
production rates. It also examined the influence of fluctuating deterioration, demand, and production
parameters in arriving at optimum deterioration cost, holding cost, and total cycle cost, as they have
important managerial insights. The effect of rental charges on the optimum total cost is examined as
the system is used for multi-purpose storage. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | MDPI | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Mathematics | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183986 | cs |
dc.rights | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | two-warehouse inventory | cs |
dc.subject | deterioration | cs |
dc.subject | multi utility production unit | cs |
dc.subject | partitioned rental warehouse | cs |
dc.subject | screening processes | cs |
dc.title | A study on two-warehouse inventory systems with integrated multi-purpose production unit and partitioned rental warehouse | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/math11183986 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 11 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 18 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | art. no. 3986 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 001078613100001 | |