Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorOrman, Łukasz J.
dc.contributor.authorKrawczyk, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorRadek, Norbert
dc.contributor.authorHonus, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorPietraszek, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorDębska, Luiza
dc.contributor.authorDudek, Agata
dc.contributor.authorKalinowski, Artur
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T09:00:43Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T09:00:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2023, vol. 16, issue 18, art. no. 6663.cs
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/152402
dc.description.abstractPeople tend to spend considerable amounts of time in buildings; thus the issue of providing proper indoor environmental quality is of significant importance. This paper experimentally analyses the subjective sensations of the occupants of intelligent and traditional buildings with the focus on possible differences between these two types of buildings. The study is based on a large database of 1302 questionnaires collected in 92 rooms where simultaneous measurements of the indoor environment physical parameters (air and globe temperature, relative humidity, carbon dioxide concentration, and illuminance) were carried out. Their impact on the subjective assessment of the indoor environment has been presented and analysed. The results show that the occupants seemed to be more favourable towards the indoor conditions in the intelligent building; however, the differences in comparison to the traditional buildings were not considerable. Similarly, self-reported productivity proved to be higher in the intelligent building, while the optimal range of air temperature, which ensured highest productivity, was 22–25 ◦C. Moreover, a strong correlation between the occupants’ overall comfort and their perception of the air quality has been found.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergiescs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/en16186663cs
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectbuilding performancecs
dc.subjectindoor environmental qualitycs
dc.subjectproductivitycs
dc.titleComparative analysis of indoor environmental quality and self-reported productivity in intelligent and traditional buildingscs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en16186663
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume16cs
dc.description.issue18cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 6663cs
dc.identifier.wos001073598000001


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.