Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDrastichová, Magdaléna
dc.contributor.authorFilzmoser, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGajanin, Rastko
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T11:51:45Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T11:51:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationProblemy Ekorozwoju. 2023, vol. 18, issue 2, p. 49-77.cs
dc.identifier.issn1895-6912
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/152407
dc.description.abstractThis work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life, which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010 – 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e. the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be in cluded. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal com ponent analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified. Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, well being and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health, particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of them had the highest values in the developed countries.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherPolitechnika Lubelska, Wydział Inżynierii Środowiskacs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProblemy Ekorozwojucs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectadjusted savingscs
dc.subjectInequality-Adjusted HDI (IHDI)cs
dc.subjectParallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC)cs
dc.subjectPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA)cs
dc.subjectsustainable developmentcs
dc.subjectwellbeingcs
dc.titleRelationships between wellbeing and sustainable development in a group of selected developed countriescs
dc.title.alternativeRelacje między dobrostanem a zrównoważonym rozwojem w grupie wybranych krajów rozwiniętychcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.35784/preko.3941
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume18cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.lastpage77cs
dc.description.firstpage49cs
dc.identifier.wos001067746400005


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/