dc.contributor.author | Drastichová, Magdaléna | |
dc.contributor.author | Filzmoser, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Gajanin, Rastko | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-25T11:51:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-25T11:51:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Problemy Ekorozwoju. 2023, vol. 18, issue 2, p. 49-77. | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1895-6912 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/152407 | |
dc.description.abstract | This work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life,
which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010
– 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e.
the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure
specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be in cluded. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected
in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal com ponent analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships
between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life
in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified.
Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more
developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, well being and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the
more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage
indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2
(for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health,
particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed
countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource
depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of
them had the highest values in the developed countries. | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Politechnika Lubelska, Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska | cs |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Problemy Ekorozwoju | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941 | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | adjusted savings | cs |
dc.subject | Inequality-Adjusted HDI (IHDI) | cs |
dc.subject | Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) | cs |
dc.subject | Principal Component Analysis (PCA) | cs |
dc.subject | sustainable development | cs |
dc.subject | wellbeing | cs |
dc.title | Relationships between wellbeing and sustainable development in a group of selected developed countries | cs |
dc.title.alternative | Relacje między dobrostanem a zrównoważonym rozwojem
w grupie wybranych krajów rozwiniętych | cs |
dc.type | article | cs |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.35784/preko.3941 | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | cs |
dc.description.volume | 18 | cs |
dc.description.issue | 2 | cs |
dc.description.lastpage | 77 | cs |
dc.description.firstpage | 49 | cs |
dc.identifier.wos | 001067746400005 | |