Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRyšánková, Kateřina
dc.contributor.authorVrtková, Adéla
dc.contributor.authorGrepl, Michal
dc.contributor.authorFilipková, Viktória
dc.contributor.authorVeselá, Adriena
dc.contributor.authorKrhut, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-28T15:02:27Z
dc.date.available2024-03-28T15:02:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBratislava Medical Journal - Bratislavské lekárske listy. 2023, vol. 124, issue 10, p. 738-741.cs
dc.identifier.issn0006-9248
dc.identifier.issn1336-0345
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/152483
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Haematuria is a common indication for a urology evaluation. In many cases, its cause is not determined unequivocally, but it does not pose any threat to the patient. However, it can represent the fi rst symptom of urinary tract cancer. BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the risk of urological malignancies in patients with haematuria who received antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy versus those who did not. METHODS: This prospective study included 562 patients with haematuria during the period of 2018‒2021. Among these, 129 patients had macroscopic haematuria. All patients underwent a urinary tract ultrasound, CT with urography, and cystoscopy. Patients with suspected malignancy underwent an appropriate surgical procedure with a pathology examination. Data were analysed with univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence rates of malignancies were 21.5 % overall, and 44.2 % and 14.8 % among patients with macroscopic and microscopic haematuria, respectively. Univariate regression showed that the odds of malignancy was signifi cantly higher among patients with antiplatelet therapy compared to patients without antiplatelet therapy (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.14‒3.05). In contrast, anticoagulation therapy did not signifi cantly increase the odds of malignancy compared to no anticoagulation therapy (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.74‒2.69). However, a multiple logistic regression model that included other known risk factors (e.g., sex or age) showed similar odds of malignancy among these patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy risk for patients who received anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy was similar to the risk observed in the general population. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy were not signifi cant risk factors of urological malignancy in patients with haematuria. The results from the present study will be used in a power analysis for an upcoming multicentre study (Tab. 4, Ref. 17).cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherAEPress s.r.ocs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBratislava Medical Journal - Bratislavské lekárske listycs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2023_112cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectanticoagulation therapycs
dc.subjectantiplatelet therapycs
dc.subjectcancercs
dc.subjecthaematuriacs
dc.subjectrisk factorcs
dc.titleRisk of genitourinary malignancy in patients that receive anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.4149/BLL_2023_112
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume124cs
dc.description.issue10cs
dc.description.lastpage741cs
dc.description.firstpage738cs
dc.identifier.wos001085010500003


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/