Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPizoń, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKonečný, Petr
dc.contributor.authorMynarz, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorBílek, Vlastimil
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T04:54:45Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T04:54:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBuildings. 2023, vol. 13, issue 12, art. no. 2969.cs
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/152699
dc.description.abstractThe present research compared the behaviours of lightweight mortars based on ordinary Portland cement (OPC), calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSAC), and calcium aluminate cement (CAC) containing expanded perlite and subjected to elevated temperatures. The perlite substituted natural sand in amounts of 25, 50, 75, and 100% by volume. The mortars were subjected to heating at up to 300 ◦C, 650 ◦C, and 1000 ◦C at a rate of 20 ◦C/min. The consistency and density of fresh mortars, compressive strength and density of hardened mortars after heating and cooling, and absorbability were assessed. Such a holistic testing approach is the main novelty of this research, which is related to the aforementioned mixtures and elevated temperatures. The main contribution of this article is a comparison of various cement types coupled with variations in the level of sand replacement with expanded perlite. In previous studies, comparisons were made in pairs of OPC-CSAC and OPC-CAC for normal-weight concrete. There is a gap in our knowledge of triple comparisons and lightweight cement composites which is filled by the current study. The use of OPC at up to 650 ◦C is recommended because it is the most common solution, its performance is similar to that of CAC, and it is cheaper than other solutions. Above 650 ◦C and up to 1000 ◦C, CAC is the only solution because it performs better than other cements. CSAC is not suitable for use at elevated temperatures because of its poor strength performance, even if it is the best solution from an environmental point of view. Sand replacement with perlite does not increase the strength performance under elevated temperatures, but its efficiency is different for various types of cement.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuildingscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122969cs
dc.rights© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectPortland cementcs
dc.subjectcalcium sulphoaluminate cementcs
dc.subjectcalcium aluminate cementcs
dc.subjectexpanded perlitecs
dc.subjectlightweight mortarscs
dc.subjectlightweight aggregatecs
dc.subjectrefractory usescs
dc.subjectelevated temperaturescs
dc.subjectcompressive strengthcs
dc.subjectcement composites propertiescs
dc.titleProperties of fine graded perlite-based lightweight cement mortars subjected to elevated temperaturescs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings13122969
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume13cs
dc.description.issue12cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 2969cs
dc.identifier.wos001131397300001


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.