Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLamantia, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorRadi, Davide
dc.contributor.authorTichý, Tomáš
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T08:35:26Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T08:35:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationComputational Economics. 2023.cs
dc.identifier.issn0927-7099
dc.identifier.issn1572-9974
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/154911
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we reconsider the model in Bischi and Lamantia (J Econ Interact Coord 17:3-27, 2022) and reformulate it in a two-population context. There, the Cournot duopoly market examined is in equilibrium (Cournot-Nash-equilibrium quantities are produced) conditionally to the players' (heterogeneous) attitudes toward cooperation. To accommodate players' attitudes, their objective functions partly include the opponent's profit, resulting in greater (partial) cooperation or hostility toward the opponent than in the standard duopoly setting. An evolutionary selection mechanism determines the survival of cooperative or competitive strategies in the duopoly. The game is symmetric and Bischi and Lamantia (J Econ Interact Coord 17:3-27, 2022) assumes that the two players involved start the game by choosing the same strategic profile. In this way, the full-fledged two-population game simplifies in a one-dimensional map. In this paper, we relax this assumption. On one hand, this approach allows us to investigate entirely the dynamics of the model and the evolutionary stability of the Nash equilibria of the static game that is implicit in the evolutionary setup. In fact, the model with only one population partially represents the system dynamics occurring in an invariant subset of the phase space. As a remarkable result, this extension shows that the steady state of the evolutionary model where all players are cooperative can be an attractor, although only in the weak sense, even when it is not a Nash equilibrium. This occurs when firms have a very high propensity to change strategies to the one that performs better. On the other hand, this approach allows us to accommodate players' heterogeneity (non-symmetric version of the game), whose analysis confirms the main insights attained in the homogeneous setting.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherSpringer Naturecs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputational Economicscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10536-7cs
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Naturecs
dc.subjectoligopoly modelingcs
dc.subjectpartial cooperationcs
dc.subjectevolutionary gamescs
dc.subjectmultipopulation gamescs
dc.subjectnonlinear dynamicscs
dc.titleTwo-population evolutionary oligopoly with partial cooperation and partial hostilitycs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10614-023-10536-7
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.identifier.wos001139002200001


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record