Odložení věci ve správním řízení

Abstract

The bachelor thesis deals with the institute of shelving a case within the framework of Czech administrative law, with a specific focus on the field of administrative punishment. This procedural act, situated on the borderline between the phase of investigating a motion and the actual initiation of proceedings, represents a fundamental mechanism in application practice that determines the further fate of the matter and the protection of the rights of the subjects involved. The text does not merely aspire to describe the current legal regulation de lege lata but subjects the way administrative authorities handle this instrument in reality to critical reflection. Particular attention is paid to the risk of resigning from the pursuit of material truth in situations where shelving a case is used for the administrative simplification of factually or legally complex cases. Through a combination of theoretical-legal analysis, interpretation of scholarly literature, and a comparison of the general regulation in the Administrative Procedure Code with the special regulation in the Act on Liability for Misdemeanors, the thesis examines whether the existing legislative framework is sufficiently rigid to eliminate space for the arbitrariness of the deciding authorities. The research further integrates economic and psychological perspectives by evaluating the transaction costs of the participants and the impacts of potential state inactivity on the perception of justice and legal certainty in society. The result is a synthesis of findings regarding the functionality and effectiveness of this institute in the context of the principles of good administration and the transparency of the exercise of public power.

Description

Delayed publication

Available after

Subject(s)

shelving of a case, administrative proceedings, administrative punishment, misdemeanor law, Administrative Procedure Code, transaction costs, good administration, legal certainty.

Citation