| dc.contributor.author | Pechrová, Marie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-14T07:50:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-02-14T07:50:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ekonomická revue. 2013, roč. 16, č. 3, s. 227-237. | cs |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1212-3951 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/101692 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of the article is to compare the effects of different fixed asset funding options for agricultural holdings.
Funding investment projects with subsidies (measure 1.1.1 Modernisation of agricultural holdings – axis I of the
Rural Development Programme), bank loans and leases are simulated and compared in terms of the share of
funding costs relative to the total amount of money received. This share in most cases enables the farmer to
unambiguously choose the fixed asset funding option. However, in the case of older farmers in more favourable
areas, the decision is not clear, as the share is the same for three-year bank loans and leases with a three-year
payback period. | cs |
| dc.format.extent | 372659 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava | cs |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Ekonomická revue | cs |
| dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7327/cerei.2013.12.03 | |
| dc.rights | © Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava | cs |
| dc.subject | agricultural holding | en |
| dc.subject | investment funding | en |
| dc.subject | modernisation | en |
| dc.subject | Rural Development Programme | en |
| dc.subject | subsidies | en |
| dc.title | Funding agricultural holdings' investment projects: focus on subsidies | en |
| dc.type | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7327/cerei.2013.12.03 | |
| dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | |