Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorKempa, Filip
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T07:39:40Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T07:39:40Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGeoScience Engineering. 2023, vol. 69, no. 1, p. 37 - 46 : ill.cs
dc.identifier.issn1802-5420cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/151426
dc.description.abstractThe ever-increasing amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has an adverse impact on the environment, causing global warming and related adverse effects. One of the most important greenhouse gases is carbon dioxide, the production of which is perceived as a carbon footprint. The carbon footprint is intended to be a tool for appropriate emission reductions and verification, so there is a great need for its standardization at the global level. In carrying out basic research and after working out the advantages and disadvantages, many methods of decarbonization have been identified. The author believes that by simplifying the classification of carbon footprint reductionapproaches into appropriate classes, a clear tool guiding companies in decarbonizing their operations will be created so that the negative impacts of global warming on the Earth are averted as quickly as possible. The aim is, therefore, to identify similarities and differences in methods, which will lead to the identification of new main groups of approaches. Within the framework of the evaluation and after making a comparison according to selected aspects of intensity, seven basic approaches have emerged,thus achieving greater clarity, usability, and better orientation for companies on the issue of reducing their carbon footprint. The results are illustrated at the end of the paper. The least challenging method for low-carbon technology adoption is the promotion of education and dissemination of climate impact awareness. Conversely, the most challenging method appears to be the construction of new green buildings.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherVysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostravacs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGeoScience Engineeringcs
dc.relation.urihttp://geoscience.cz/ojs/index.php/GSE/article/view/409/288cs
dc.rights© Vysoká škola báňská-Technická Univerzita Ostrava. Hornicko-geologická fakultacs
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectadvantagescs
dc.subjectcarbon footprintcs
dc.subjectclassification of wayscs
dc.subjectcomparisoncs
dc.subjectdisadvantagescs
dc.titleClassification of Methods to Reduce the Carbon Footprintcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.35180/gse-2023-0087
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam

© Vysoká škola báňská-Technická Univerzita Ostrava. Hornicko-geologická fakulta
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je © Vysoká škola báňská-Technická Univerzita Ostrava. Hornicko-geologická fakulta