dc.contributor.author | Garcia, X. T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zigmund, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Terlizzi, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pavlanin, Rastislav | |
dc.contributor.author | Salvatore, L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-31T15:44:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-31T15:44:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Advances in electrical and electronic engineering. 2006, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 76-81. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1336-1376 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10084/83771 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a comparison between two control strategies for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM):
Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC). These two strategies can be considered among the family of Vector
Control (VC) methods and provide a solution for high-performance drives. This paper presents the implementation of both strategies
in PMSM drives. Advantages and disadvantages of both methods are discussed and different simulation tests are performed to
illustrate the features of both methods. The criteria followed to establish a fair comparison between both control methods is also
presented. | en |
dc.format.extent | 223564 bytes | cs |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | cs |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Žilinská univerzita v Žiline. Elektrotechnická fakulta | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Advances in electrical and electronic engineering | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://advances.utc.sk/index.php/AEEE | en |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) | en |
dc.rights | © Žilinská univerzita v Žiline. Elektrotechnická fakulta | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | en |
dc.title | Comparison between FOC and DTC strategies for permanent magnet synchronous
motors | en |
dc.type | article | en |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | cs |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | cs |