The Bacharach method: A low-cost tool for small-scale combustion units’ flue gas quality control

dc.contributor.authorRyšavý, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorYan, Wei-Mon
dc.contributor.authorSangeetha, Thangavel
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Jenn-Kun
dc.contributor.authorWang, Cheng-Chi
dc.contributor.authorHopan, František
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, Maria
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Carla Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorKuboňová, Lenka
dc.contributor.authorOchodek, Tadeáš
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-05T13:10:51Z
dc.date.available2026-05-05T13:10:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAlthough current EU regulations, such as EU Directive 2015/1189 on the eco-design of solid fuel boilers and Directive 2015/1188, in accordance with the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, require manufacturers to meet specific emission requirements for CE marking, the routine and regular onsite testing of household heating appliances is still not mandatory in many EU countries. This research endeavour addressed this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of the Bacharach method as a rapid and cost-effective tool for assessing flue gas quality, particularly in terms of particulate matter mass concentration. This study also compared the results of the Bacharach method with those obtained from two commercially available portable analysers. The research outcomes demonstrate that the Bacharach method, in combination with an innovative evaluation approach, offers a viable solution, enabling the swift and economical assessment of flue gas quality with the primary objective of determining the boiler class according to the limits specified by standard EN 303-5 under operating conditions. The modified Bacharach method for measuring TSP in solid fuel-fired boilers provides qualitatively similar results to the commercially used SM500 and STM225 instruments. The modified Bacharach methodology was primarily developed for comparison to the boiler class 3 limit (i.e., 125 and 150 mg/m3). The study revealed that the modified Bacharach method, when applied to biomass-based boilers, exhibited higher accuracies in the case of classification into classes 3 and 4, whereas fossil fuel-based boilers demonstrated higher accuracy in the case of class 5 limits.
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 232
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.description.volume7
dc.identifier.citationFire. 2024, vol. 7, issue 7, art. no. 232.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/fire7070232
dc.identifier.issn2571-6255
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/158560
dc.identifier.wos001277148200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFire
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/fire7070232
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
dc.rights.accessopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectsolid fuel
dc.subjectparticulate matter
dc.subjectsmall-scale combustion units
dc.subjectflue gas
dc.subjectBacharach method
dc.titleThe Bacharach method: A low-cost tool for small-scale combustion units’ flue gas quality control
dc.typearticle
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewed
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
local.files.count1
local.files.size7409879
local.has.filesyes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2571-6255-2024v7i7an232.pdf
Size:
7.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
718 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: