Selected transformation methods and their comparison for VCG leads deriving

dc.contributor.authorVondrák, Jaroslav
dc.contributor.authorPenhaker, Marek
dc.contributor.authorJurek, František
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T06:35:30Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T06:35:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractVectorcardiography (VCG) as an alternative form of 12-lead ECG is another method of measuring the electrical activity of the heart. The use of vectorcardiography in clinical practice is not common, but VCG leads can be derived from 12-lead ECG. VCG has proven to be a useful and more accurate tool for diagnosing various heart diseases within automated detection. This paper presents the application of four transformation methods namely: Kors regression, IDT, QLSV and Quasi-Orthogonal transformation to obtain a derived VCG. A total of 20 physiological and 20 records with the diagnosis of myocardial infarction were used. For physiological records, the Kors regression method achieved the best results in leads X and Y with relative deviation <1%, correlation and percentage similarity >99%. In lead Z, the QLSV method achieved the most accurate results with relative deviation <1%, correlation >98% and percentage similarity >99%. For pathological records, the most accurate method in all leads was Kors regression with relative deviation <2.2%, correlation >93% and percentage similarity >97%. From these results, there is the possibility of creating a new transformation method from the existing ones in order to obtain a more accurate transformation.cs
dc.description.firstpage3475cs
dc.description.issue5cs
dc.description.lastpage3485cs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume61cs
dc.identifier.citationAlexandria Engineering Journal. 2022, vol. 61, issue 5, p. 3475-3485.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.068
dc.identifier.issn1110-0168
dc.identifier.issn2090-2670
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/146275
dc.identifier.wos000768904400010
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherElseviercs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAlexandria Engineering Journalcs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.068cs
dc.rights© 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.cs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/cs
dc.subjecttransformation methodscs
dc.subjectVCGcs
dc.subjecttransformation matrixcs
dc.subjectvectorcardiographycs
dc.subjectmyocardial infarctioncs
dc.titleSelected transformation methods and their comparison for VCG leads derivingcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1110-0168-2022v61i5p3475.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
718 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: