Must the best laboratory prepared catalyst also be the best in an operational application?

dc.contributor.authorObalová, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorKlegová, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMatějová, Lenka
dc.contributor.authorPacultová, Kateřina
dc.contributor.authorFridrichová, Dagmar
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-24T11:18:04Z
dc.date.available2019-04-24T11:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThree cobalt mixed oxide deN(2)O catalysts, with optimal content of alkali metals (K, Cs), were prepared on a large scale, shaped into tablets, and tested in a pilot plant reactor connected to the bypassed tail gas from the nitric production plant, downstream from the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia (SCR NOx/NH3) catalyst. High efficiency in N2O removal (N2O conversion of 75-90% at 450 degrees C, VHSV = 11,000 m(3) m(bed)(-3) h(-1)) was achieved. However, a different activity order of the commercially prepared catalyst tablets compared to the laboratory prepared catalyst grains was observed. Catalytic experiments in the kinetic regime using laboratory and commercial prepared catalysts and characterization methods (XRD, TPR-H-2, physisorption, and chemical analysis) were utilized to explain this phenomenon. Experimentally determined internal effectiveness factors and their general dependency on kinetic constants were evaluated to discuss the relationship between the catalyst activity in the kinetic regime and the internal diffusion limitation in catalyst tablets as well as their morphology. The theoretical N2O conversion as a function of the intrinsic kinetic constants and diffusion rate, expressed as effective diffusion coefficients, was evaluated to estimate the final catalyst performance on a large scale and to answer the question of the above article title.cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 160cs
dc.description.issue2cs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume9cs
dc.identifier.citationCatalysts. 2019, vol. 9, issue 2, art. no. 160.cs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/catal9020160
dc.identifier.issn2073-4344
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/134749
dc.identifier.wos000460702200054
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCatalystscs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/catal9020160cs
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectinternal effectiveness factorcs
dc.subjecteffective diffusion coefficientcs
dc.subjectN2Ocs
dc.subjectcatalytic decompositioncs
dc.subjectcobalt mixed oxidecs
dc.subjectalkali metalcs
dc.subjectpromotercs
dc.titleMust the best laboratory prepared catalyst also be the best in an operational application?cs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2073-4344-2019v9i2an160.pdf
Size:
5.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 out of 1 results
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: