Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorZmeškal, Zdeněkcs
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Taocs
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-06T07:39:51Z
dc.date.available2014-11-06T07:39:51Z
dc.date.issued2014cs
dc.identifier.otherOSD002cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/105905
dc.descriptionImport 06/11/2014cs
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is focused on the multiple choice decision-making problems applied in insurance industry. We have introduced the character of MCDM problem, and the possible methods to solve it. we have totally introduced 4 methods, including Analytic hierarchy method (AHP), simple additive weighting method (SAW), VIKOR method, and TOPSIS method. the AHP method is used to calculate the weights of every criterion, and the value of the weights will be use in the rest method. always the first step when applying the method is to figure out the normalized value of all criteria. even though we are applying all methods to one healthy insurance choice problem, we will always get different results. in order to determine the best alternative, we will have to compare all the results from all methods. there will be a lot of calculations and formulas in this thesis.en
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is focused on the multiple choice decision-making problems applied in insurance industry. We have introduced the character of MCDM problem, and the possible methods to solve it. we have totally introduced 4 methods, including Analytic hierarchy method (AHP), simple additive weighting method (SAW), VIKOR method, and TOPSIS method. the AHP method is used to calculate the weights of every criterion, and the value of the weights will be use in the rest method. always the first step when applying the method is to figure out the normalized value of all criteria. even though we are applying all methods to one healthy insurance choice problem, we will always get different results. in order to determine the best alternative, we will have to compare all the results from all methods. there will be a lot of calculations and formulas in this thesis.cs
dc.format.extent2241420 bytescs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherVysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostravacs
dc.subjectMCDM problem, insurance problem, AHP method, Saaty, SAW method, VIKOR method, TOPSIS method China Life, normalization, criteria, weightsen
dc.subjectMCDM problem, insurance problem, AHP method, Saaty, SAW method, VIKOR method, TOPSIS method China Life, normalization, criteria, weightscs
dc.titleMultiple Criteria Choice of the Health Insurance in China Marketen
dc.title.alternativeVícekriteriální výběr zdravotního pojištění na čínském trhucs
dc.typeDiplomová prácecs
dc.contributor.refereeNovotný, Josefcs
dc.date.accepted2014-09-04cs
dc.thesis.degree-nameIng.cs
dc.thesis.degree-levelMagisterský studijní programcs
dc.thesis.degree-grantorVysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava. Ekonomická fakultacs
dc.description.department154 - Katedra financícs
dc.thesis.degree-programHospodářská politika a správacs
dc.thesis.degree-branchFinancecs
dc.description.resultvelmi dobřecs
dc.identifier.senderS2751cs
dc.identifier.thesisLIU0006_EKF_N6202_6202T010_01_2014
dc.rights.accessopenAccess


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam