Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHesse, Holger C.
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorMusilek, Petr
dc.contributor.authorNaumann, Maik
dc.contributor.authorTruong, Cong
dc.contributor.authorJossen, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-30T13:17:29Z
dc.date.available2017-08-30T13:17:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2017, vol. 10, issue 7, art. no. 835.cs
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/120170
dc.description.abstractBattery energy storage systems (BESS) coupled with rooftop-mounted residential photovoltaic (PV) generation, designated as PV-BESS, draw increasing attention and market penetration as more and more such systems become available. The manifold BESS deployed to date rely on a variety of different battery technologies, show a great variation of battery size, and power electronics dimensioning. However, given today's high investment costs of BESS, a well-matched design and adequate sizing of the storage systems are prerequisites to allow profitability for the end-user. The economic viability of a PV-BESS depends also on the battery operation, storage technology, and aging of the system. In this paper, a general method for comprehensive PV-BESS techno-economic analysis and optimization is presented and applied to the state-of-art PV-BESS to determine its optimal parameters. Using a linear optimization method, a cost-optimal sizing of the battery and power electronics is derived based on solar energy availability and local demand. At the same time, the power flow optimization reveals the best storage operation patterns considering a trade-off between energy purchase, feed-in remuneration, and battery aging. Using up to date technology-specific aging information and the investment cost of battery and inverter systems, three mature battery chemistries are compared; a lead-acid (PbA) system and two lithium-ion systems, one with lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) and another with lithium-nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) cathode. The results show that different storage technology and component sizing provide the best economic performances, depending on the scenario of load demand and PV generation.cs
dc.format.extent1572900 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergiescs
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/en10070835cs
dc.rights© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectbattery energy storage systemcs
dc.subjectbattery agingcs
dc.subjectlinear programmingcs
dc.subjectsize optimizationcs
dc.subjectlithium-ion batterycs
dc.subjectcost analysiscs
dc.subjectphotovoltaic panelcs
dc.subjecteconomic analysiscs
dc.subjectresidential batterycs
dc.titleEconomic optimization of component sizing for residential battery storage systemscs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en10070835
dc.rights.accessopenAccess
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioncs
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.description.volume10cs
dc.description.issue7cs
dc.description.firstpageart. no. 835cs
dc.identifier.wos000406700200006


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.